| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 3A/09 |
| Determination date | 10 March 2009 |
| Member | P Cheyne |
| Representation | W Gilchrist ; P Zwart |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Gilchrist v White Gold Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Successful personal grievance - Applicant sought lost wages and petrol costs in attending investigation meeting, advocacy costs, stationary costs, and lodgement fee - Authority found applicant's advocate made notional claim for expenses incurred - Authority found advocate applicant's mother and had not charged applicant for time and no legal obligation on applicant to pay - Authority found stationary costs also notional - Authority found lost remuneration not recoverable as expenses incurred - Authority found applicant entitled to reimbursement of lodgement fee - ARREARS OF HOLIDAY PAY - In earlier determination Authority determined holiday pay owing but reserved leave if dispute - Authority found $41.92 shortfall and interest owing to applicant |
| Result | Costs in favour of applicant ($70) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($41.92) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA Second Schedule cl 15(1) |
| Cases Cited | Murphy t/a Enzo's Pizza v Van Beek [1998] 3 ERNZ 736 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 3a_09.pdf [pdf 25 KB] |