Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 87/09
Hearing date 18 Dec 2008
Determination date 25 March 2009
Member J Wilson
Representation C Morris (Applicant in person) ; No appearance
Location Auckland
Parties M v C NZ Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – No appearance for respondent – Applicant claimed employed by respondent until advised by respondent’s owners (“C”) in United States (“US”) that dismissed – C’s solicitor advised Authority had received statement of problem and advised C’s directors but received no instructions – C’s solicitor advised Authority acted for C’s directors but not respondent – Authority satisfied applicant’s documents properly served and C’s directors aware of applicant’s claims and Authority investigation – Authority found applicant’s inability to obtain US entry visa catalyst for dismissal – Found dismissal unjustified – Remedies – Found not within Authority’s power to order apology – Found applicant entitled to $8400 reimbursement of lost wages – Found American directors avoided communicating clearly with applicant to arrange dignified exit – Found $10000 compensation appropriate – ARREARS OF HOLIDAY PAY – Authority ordered respondent to pay applicant $4672 arrears of holiday pay Australia/New Zealand country manager
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($8,400) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($10,000) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($4,672) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($470) ; Interest (5 percent)
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA Clause 12 of Schedule 2;ERA s124
Number of Pages 7
PDF File Link: aa 87_09.pdf [pdf 26 KB]