| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 117/09 |
| Hearing date | 9 Apr 2009 |
| Determination date | 14 April 2009 |
| Member | V Campbell |
| Representation | R Keightley (in person) ; M Mulligan |
| Location | Hamilton |
| Parties | Keightley (Labour Inspector) v Zuki's Ltd |
| Summary | ARREARS OF HOLIDAY PAY – Applicant Labour Inspector sought holiday pay of $1,078 and reimbursement of unlawful deductions on behalf of employee (S") – Parties agreed amount sought for arrears correct – Respondent claimed deductions made because S undertook two courses, had hair coloured and possession of work product - No written employment agreement – No written consent for deductions – Authority found deductions unlawful – S gave consent to Authority to offset arrears by cost of one course and $10.00 for hair colour – S claimed not in possession of product and no agreement made to reimburse respondent for other course – Authority found not in possession of product and no written consent – Interest payable – Respondent ordered to pay applicant arrears of holiday pay and reimburse deductions – Beauty Therapist" |
| Result | Application granted ; Arrears of holiday pay ($743.80) ; Interest (5%) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($70)(Filing fee) |
| Main Category | Arrears |
| Statutes | Wages Protection Act 1983 s4;Wages Protection Act 1983 s5(1) |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 117_09.pdf [pdf 16 KB] |