Restrictions Includes non-publication order
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 181/09
Hearing date 8 Apr 2009
Determination date 15 June 2009
Member A Dumbleton
Representation K Single ; A Prentice
Location Auckland
Parties Watson v Ryjack Holdings Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed following sick leave – Parties concluded Memorandum of Understanding (“MoU”)to resolve dispute and respondent agreed to provide written employment agreement (“EA”) – Applicant refused to sign EA as erroneous – Applicant obtained medical certificate requiring “indefinite” sick leave – Respondent unable to communicate with applicant regarding reasons for indefinite sick leave – Applicant summarily dismissed – Authority found applicant’s failure to be communicative to respondent’s reasonable enquiries breached duty of good faith – Found medical certificate did not meet s68 Holidays Act 2003 – Found applicant could have made respondent aware of condition through wife or doctor – Found applicant’s misconduct not sufficiently serious for summary dismissal – Applicant claimed dismissal unjustified on grounds of false dishonestly allegations – Found respondent’s suspicion of dishonesty arose after dismissal – Dismissal unjustified – REMEDIES – Found 100 percent contributory conduct – Reimbursement of two weeks wages in lieu of notice – ARREARS OF WAGES – Applicant claimed underpayment of wages – Found grievance not raised within time and MoU resolved all other arrears issues - Sales Representative
Result Application granted ; Pay in lieu of notice ($1,2000) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s4(1A);ERA s103A;ERA s124;ERA cl10, sch2;Holidays Act 2003 s68
Number of Pages 8
PDF File Link: aa 181_09.pdf [pdf 31 KB]