Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 199/09
Hearing date 19 Jun 2009
Determination date 22 June 2009
Member L Robinson
Representation A McInally ; P Muir
Location Auckland
Parties New Zealand Amalgamated Engineering Printing & Manufacturing Union Inc v APN Print New Zealand Ltd
Summary DISPUTE – First issue, whether collective employment agreement (“CEA”) permitted respondent to implement shift changes without applicant union’s agreement – Second issue, whether sufficient notice of changes given – Respondent’s “Proposal Z” recommended shift changes to increase efficiency – Respondent consulted with applicant union and individual employees – Proposal Z subsequently amended to Proposal Z1 – Applicant union rejected respondent’s request to consult with employees on Proposal ZI during CEA negotiations – Respondent made Proposal ZI available to employees at their workplace – Respondent gave applicant union one month notice of decision to implement Proposal ZI following failure to agree on revised shift pattern – Authority found CEA gave respondent prerogative to change shifts according to needs of business without agreement from applicant union – Found respondent entered into good faith consultations with employees – Found effective notice of Proposal ZI given to employees through applicant union – Found amendments to Proposal Z immaterial therefore sufficient consultations held with respect to Proposal Z1 – Question answered in favour of respondent
Result Question answered in favour of respondent ; Costs reserved
Main Category Dispute
Cases Cited Association of Staff in Tertiary Education Inc: A S T E Te Hau Takitini O Aotearoa v Hampton [2002] 1 ERNZ 491;Lowe Walker Paeroa Ltd v Bennett [1998] 2 ERNZ 558;New Zealand Tramways and Public Transport Employees Union Inc v Transportation Auckland Corporation Ltd [2006] ERNZ 1005;Wholesale Distributors Ltd v Gibbons Holdings Ltd [2008] 1 NZLR 277
Number of Pages 8
PDF File Link: aa 199_09.pdf [pdf 26 KB]