Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No CA 105/09
Hearing date 4 Feb 2009
Determination date 17 July 2009
Member P Montgomery
Representation R Thompson ; A Roberts
Location Christchurch
Parties Paterson v Roberts t/a Robbie's Cranford
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Poor performance - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed – Respondent argued applicant subject to trial period and dismissal justified for poor performance – Applicant initially employed as chef and subsequently offered manager position – Applicant required to undertake one week’s training, however, training lasted four weeks as applicant unable to accurately follow instructions and made recurring mistakes – Respondent advised applicant mistake to employ applicant as manager and offered applicant chef position – Applicant declined offer - Parties made settlement agreement to terminate employment relationship – Applicant claimed employment not subject to trial period – Claimed not warned about purpose of meeting and not given notice employment at risk – Authority found employment agreement (“EA”) provided applicant subject to trial period – Found dismissal was for poor performance in role of manager – Found accord and satisfaction between parties at time of dismissal to settle matters relating to termination – Found procedural deficiencies as applicant not notified of purpose of meeting and not notified employment at risk – Found respondent failed to meet obligations in EA – Respondent did not advise applicant reasons for dissatisfaction with performance, what improvements required, and period of time improvement to be achieved - Dismissal unjustified – REMEDIES – No contributory conduct - Authority declined award for remuneration of lost wages as probable applicant would have been dismissed even if proper procedures followed – Gave weight to applicant’s decline of alternative position and settlement agreement – Found $1,000 compensation appropriate – Site Manager
Result Application granted ; Compensation for humiliation ($1,000) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A
Cases Cited Waitakere City Council v Ioane [2004] 2 ERNZ 194
Number of Pages 9
PDF File Link: ca 105_09.pdf [pdf 40 KB]