Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 169/09
Hearing date 22 May 2009
Determination date 27 May 2009
Member A Dumbleton
Representation P McBride, T Kennedy ; P Churchman, S Maclean
Location Auckland
Parties Smith v The Commissioner of Police
Summary INJUNCTION – Application for interim injunction – Applicant sought interim injunction restraining respondent from continuing review into applicant’s employment – Independent reviewer advised applicant of review and information sought – Respondent opposed application – Authority satisfied arguable case established – Respondent argued not performance review of applicant – Applicant claimed review announced to applicant without any prior consultation – Authority found balance of convenience favoured respondent – Found at this stage review a structured systematic enquiry by respondent into way applicant carrying out role – Found general principle employer entitled to ascertain facts directly from employee at any time – Found important applicant only asked to describe practices and processes – Found if review lead to disciplinary consequences for applicant then protected by procedures in employment agreement and remedies in Employment Relations Act 2000 – Found no evidence of any unlawful, unfair, or unreasonable actions by respondent – Found overall justice favoured respondent – Found no actual disadvantage had arisen on evidence – Found quia timet injunctions had high required standard – Found fear of threatened harm not sufficient for quia timet – Authority suggested parties should discuss and agree how applicant should inform co-workers about review to avoid rumour and speculation – Interim injunction declined – Authority declined to make non-publication order
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Injunction
Statutes ERA s4(1A);ERA Clause 10 of schedule 2
Number of Pages 7
PDF File Link: aa 169_09.pdf [pdf 24 KB]