| Restrictions | Includes non-publication order |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 284/09 |
| Determination date | 17 August 2009 |
| Member | J Wilson |
| Representation | A Crabb, K P(in person) ; D France |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | P v University of Auckland |
| Summary | COSTS - Successful practice and procedure claims - Matters determined on the papers - Applicant sought $5,000 contribution to costs - Respondent reiterated agreement with Authority’s preliminary view that Employment Court should determine issues of costs as part of decision on costs following substantive hearing - Authority found issues straightforward and no dispute between parties as to facts - Found applicant provided no evidence to support claim for costs - Accepted applicant incurred additional costs because of Employment Court’s administrative decision however, unfair to burden respondent with those costs - Costs to lie where they fall |
| Result | Costs to lie where they fall |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Cases Cited | PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] 1 ERNZ 808;P v University of Auckland unreported, J Wilson, 30 Jun 2008, AA 223/08;P v University of Auckland unreported, J Wilson, 2 Sep 2008, AA 223A/08 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |