| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | WA 113/09 |
| Determination date | 18 August 2009 |
| Member | P R Stapp |
| Representation | P McBride, G Ballara ; S Grice, A Higgins |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | Kanar v Gurleyen & Anor |
| Other Parties | Sultans Harem Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS – First respondent lodged application to adjourn investigation meeting – Parties agreed adjournment subject to costs being fixed against first respondent – Respondent claimed applicant in receipt of legal aid therefore increase in costs disingenuous – Applicant argued first respondent should pay $750 as reasonable contribution for indulgence – Authority found application for adjournment caused applicant to incur extra costs – Found adjournment not reasonably expected by applicant – Found $250 contribution to costs appropriate – Costs in favour of applicant |
| Result | Costs in favour of applicant ($250) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | wa 113_09.pdf [pdf 11 KB] |