| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 148/02 |
| Hearing date | 14 May 2002 |
| Determination date | 22 May 2002 |
| Member | R A Monaghan |
| Representation | W Peters ; L Campbell |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Morrow v Kamo Home & Village Charitable Trust |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Restructuring - Positions merged - Alleged guaranteed new position - Position subsequently advertised publicly - Applicant chose not to apply on belief no longer wanted for position - Alleged redundancy not genuine - No evidence to question genuineness of redundancy - Position had substantially altered - Respondent did not guarantee position - Had indicated preference towards applicant - Preference was not guarantee - Dismissal justified - Administrative assistant |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Cases Cited | Coutts Cars Ltd v Baguley [2001] ERNZ 660;New Zealand Fasteners Stainless Ltd v Thwaites [2000] 1 ERNZ 739 |
| Number of Pages | 6 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |