Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No CA 164/09
Hearing date 4 Aug 2009
Determination date 01 October 2009
Member J Crichton
Representation R Harris ; J Farrow
Location Dunedin
Parties Miles v Murrays Veterinary Clinic Ltd
Summary RAISING PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – Whether grievance raised within 90 day period – Applicant claimed unjustified dismissal – Respondent argued proper restructuring process identified need for new position which subsumed applicant’s position – Respondent contended personal grievance raised out of time – Evidence showed letter raising personal grievance drafted and prepared but not received by respondent – Authority found grievance not properly raised – Found first correspondence received by respondent well outside 90 day period – Found grievance not raised in meeting between respondent and applicant – Applicant argued wages claim prevented progressing personal grievance – Found wages claim resolved and no further steps taken in relation to personal grievance – Applicant contended employment agreement did not provide explanation of resolution of employment relationship – Respondent argued resolution of employment relationship covered in policy and procedures manual which was pointed out and physically available to applicant – Respondent’s evidence preferred – Applicant claimed request for written reasons for dismissal declined – Respondent argued no request ever made – Applicant’s solicitor did not refer to alleged failure in letter of grievance – Found grievance not raised in time – Authority rejected application for leave to raise personal grievance out of time – Vet nurse
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Raising PG
Statutes ERA s114(3);ERA s115
Cases Cited Coy v Commissioner of Police unreported, Colgan CJ, 19 Nov 2007, CC 23/07;Creedy v Commissioner of Police [2006] 1 ERNZ 517
Number of Pages 10
PDF File Link: ca 164_09.pdf [pdf 31 KB]