| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 126A/09 |
| Determination date | 30 October 2009 |
| Member | P Montgomery |
| Representation | R Thompson ; O Paulsen |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Ford v Metallic Sweeping (1998) Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Substantive matter in favour of respondent - One and a half day investigation meeting - Authority found labyrinthine progress to uncomplicated matter inflated costs - Authority found contribution to costs sought reflected actual costs - Found notification of claim beyond 90 day limit and decline of Calderbank offer considered - Found costs to follow the event - Applicant to pay respondent $1,500 contribution to costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of respondent ($1,500) ; Disbursements in favour of respondent ($211.21) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Cases Cited | PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] 1 ERNZ 808 |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 126a_09.pdf [pdf 14 KB] |