| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 386/09 |
| Hearing date | 8 Sep 2009 |
| Determination date | 04 November 2009 |
| Member | K J Anderson |
| Representation | D Henwood (in person) ; W Henwood |
| Location | Hamilton |
| Parties | Henwood v Piako Security Ltd |
| Summary | ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY – Applicant claimed employment terminated because respondent stopped paying wages and removed from roles as director and shareholder – No claim of constructive dismissal brought – Applicant claimed owed wages for 4 years in sum of $83,000 and $7,000 in holiday pay – Respondent argued applicant terminated employment and no monies owed – Authority found applicant shareholder and director as well as employee and shared influence as to payment, holidays and how business functioned – Found applicant partly responsible to keep accurate wage and time records – No evidence to support claim for wages and holiday pay |
| Result | Application dismissed ; No order for costs |
| Main Category | Arrears |
| Statutes | ERA s114;ERA s130;Holidays Act 2003 s73;Holidays Act 2003 s81 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 386_09.pdf [pdf 20 KB] |