Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No WA 167/09
Hearing date 1 Sep 2009 - 2 Sep 2009 (2 days)
Determination date 03 November 2009
Member G J Wood
Representation H White ; J Rooney
Location New Plymouth
Parties Hart v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Misconduct – Respondent argued applicant justifiably dismissed following full and fair investigation into serious misconduct relating to failure to follow directions from and obstruction and abuse of supervisor – Applicant claimed did not commit instances of serious misconduct alleged – Applicant argued supervisor became angry for refusing to sign off health and safety sheets and refused to allow time to read manual – Applicant alleged assault by supervisor – Applicant suspended – Disciplinary meeting held and allegations against applicant discussed – Applicant dismissed – Applicant alleged bias by respondent – Authority found limited evidence of bias – Found no inequality of treatment between applicant and supervisor – Applicant argued allegations not specific – Found allegations lacked specificity but applicant knew of issues and was able to provide full account of events – Found respondent had plenty of evidence from eye witnesses that applicant’s behaviour unacceptable – Found misunderstandings on training requirements – Found investigation not perfect but full and fair investigation held – Found applicant failed to comply with policies and guidelines – Found serious misconduct – Applicant had received number of warnings – Found warnings demonstrated respondent’s problems with applicant ongoing – Dismissal justified – Operator
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Cases Cited Airline Stewards and Hostesses of NZ IUOW v Air New Zealand Ltd [1990] 3 NZLR 549;NZ (with exceptions) Food Processing etc IUOW v Unilever New Zealand Ltd [1990] 1 NZILR 35
Number of Pages 15
PDF File Link: wa 167_09.pdf [pdf 57 KB]