Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 459/09
Hearing date 26 Feb 2009 - 9 Apr 2009 (2 days)
Determination date 18 December 2009
Member M Urlich
Representation P Shepherd (Applicant in person) ; No appearance
Location Auckland
Parties Shepherd v Steelserv Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – Applicant claimed demotion and failure to consult about changes to employment agreement (“EA”) during business restructuring caused disadvantage – Respondent argued no demotion and followed proper procedures – No dispute applicant’s EA changed due to restructuring – Interim structure in place during restructuring process – Applicant sent two letters advising unhappy with interim structure however would continue to work in good faith until final structure decided – Letter advised wished to be made redundant if not appointed to original position with original reporting lines - Restructuring changed applicant’s original reporting line without prior consultation – Applicant raised grievance - Authority found applicant not made redundant by new structure – Found while respondent discussed with applicant interim structure, respondent did not consult with applicant about decision to confirm interim structure as permanent structure – Found failure to consult applicant on permanent change to EA caused disadvantage - Unjustified disadvantage – REMEDIES – No contributory damages – No lost wages awarded - $3,000 compensation appropriate – Operations Manager
Result Application granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($3,000) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s4(1);ERA s4(4)(c);ERA s103A;ERA s124
Cases Cited Wellington International Airport Ltd v Air New Zealand [1993] 1 NZLR 691 (CA)
Number of Pages 15
PDF File Link: aa 459_09.pdf [pdf 36 KB]