Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 446/09
Hearing date 11 Nov 2009
Determination date 10 December 2009
Member M Urlich
Representation S Mitchell ; K Dunn
Location Auckland
Parties Phillips v Ports of Auckland Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Applicant dismissed for failing to notify respondent of non-attendance at work – Applicant claimed respondent failed to consider applicant unwell before making dismissal decision – Applicant sought reinstatement – Respondent argued applicant’s return to work after workplace injury was patchy and failed to advise attendance – Respondent argued no reasonable explanation provided by applicant for failing to attend physiotherapy appointment – Applicant claimed struggling to adjust to medications and de-motivated by light duties regime – Authority found no reasonable basis for respondent not to accept applicant’s explanation for non-attendance – Found fair and reasonable employer would have sought further information to better understand applicant’s issues – Found fair and reasonable employer would have accepted applicant’s explanation given factors presented – Found respondent’s conclusions about applicant’s previous work history not fairly put to applicant for comment – Found unclear from evidence what and how other mitigating factors had been considered by respondent – Dismissal unjustified – REMEDIES – Authority found applicant recovering from injury and reinstatement posed no practical difficulty if given light duty regime – Found final written warning no barrier to reinstatement in circumstances – Reinstatement ordered – No contributory conduct – No claim for lost wages – Found $5,000 compensation appropriate
Result Application granted ; Reinstatement ordered ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($5,000)
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s125;ERA s125(2);ERA s103A
Cases Cited Air New Zealand Ltd v V [2009] ERNZ 185
Number of Pages 7
PDF File Link: aa 446_09.pdf [pdf 38 KB]