Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 129/10
Hearing date 19 Mar 2010
Determination date 19 March 2010
Member R Arthur
Representation E Travers, K Travers (Applicants in person) ; B Gauld
Location Auckland
Parties Travers and Anor v Interiors By Sensation Ltd
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Correct identity of employer – First and second applicants claimed respondent correct employer – Respondent argued Sensation Yachts Ltd (“SYL”) applicants’ employer at all material times – No dispute arrears of wages due and owing for applicants – Applicants initially employed by SYL – SYL in receivership - Applicants claimed respondent’s accountant (“X”) offered, and applicants verbally agreed, to transfer employment agreement (“EA”) to respondent – Applicants’ IRD documentation listed respondent as employer after date of alleged EA transfer – Second applicant’s affidavit stated second applicant employed by SYL at all material times – Second applicant claimed statement genuine error – Respondent argued no verbal EA transfer took place – Argued SYL’s payroll mistakenly recorded applicants’ employer as respondent to IRD – Argued no mistake made in second applicant’s affidavit – Authority found verbal EA transfer took place – Found respondent subsequently became applicants’ employer – Accepted second applicant made genuine error in affidavit – Accepted IRD documentation correct – Found respondent applicants’ employer – Leave reserved for applicants to seek orders for arrears of wages – COSTS – No order for costs
Result Application granted ; Disbursements in favour of first and second applicants ($70)(Filing fee) ; No order for costs
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Statutes ERA s131;ERA s159
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: aa 129_10.pdf [pdf 23 KB]