| Restrictions | Includes non-publication order |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 177/10 |
| Hearing date | 16 Apr 2010 |
| Determination date | 20 April 2010 |
| Member | Y S Oldfield |
| Representation | L Foulkes (Applicant in person) ; M Austin |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Foulkes v Good Start Property Developments Ltd |
| Summary | COMPLIANCE ORDER – Applicant sought compliance with settlement agreement and Authority determination – Undisputed respondent failed to comply with agreement and determination – Respondent argued Authority should exercise discretion in their favour as compliance order would be of no practical benefit to applicant – Argued respondent’s assets not liquidated, did not know when assets would sell, and did not expect asset to fetch market price – Authority found despite cash flow and liquidity problems, applicant entitled to secure position as granted by agreement and Authority determination – Respondent ordered to pay applicant $4,431 plus interest pursuant settlement agreement – Respondent ordered to pay applicant $1,287 pursuant to Authority determination - Compliance ordered |
| Result | Compliance Ordered |
| Main Category | Compliance Order |
| Statutes | ERA s149 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 177_10.pdf [pdf 19 KB] |