Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No CA 103/10
Hearing date 29 Oct 2007
Determination date 30 April 2010
Member P Montgomery
Representation H Miller (Applicant in person) ; M Pearcy
Location Christchurch
Parties Miller v Michael Pearcy Investments Ltd
Summary ARREARS OF WAGES - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Constructive dismissal – Respondent accepted earlier Employment Court decision that applicant an employee and dismissal breached Employment Relations Act 2000 – Respondent argued commission not owing as applicant had not met sales threshold – Authority found given respondent’s acceptance at fault in dismissal process remedies to be considered – Subsequently, relationship between parties deteriorated – Applicant gave company vehicle keys to respondent which respondent considered as resignation – Authority found applicant’s behaviour in altercations fell short of acceptable – However, found partly fuelled by respondent – Found situation direct result of parties’ failure to establish and record terms of relationship – Found dismissal unjustified – Authority found had no way of knowing accuracy of respondent’s figures in relation to calculation of commission payment – Found approach to be taken based on Authority’s equity and good conscience jurisdiction – Found majority of sales made by applicant – Found applicant entitled to commission at 5 percent on sales – Remedies – Found $8,000 compensation appropriate – Found $4,903 reimbursement of lost wages – Found $2,179 arrears of holiday pay – Authority ordered respondent to pay applicant $4,875 in unpaid commissions – Sales person
Result Applications granted (Constructive dismissal)(Arrears of wages) ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($4,903.85) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($2,179.48) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($8,000) ; Arrears of wages ($4,875)(Commission payments) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA 2000
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: ca 103_10.pdf [pdf 29 KB]