| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 198/10 |
| Determination date | 29 April 2010 |
| Member | A Dumbleton |
| Representation | V White ; J Keeley (in person) |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Hooton v Keeley t/a WOF Testing Station |
| Summary | COMPLIANCE ORDER – PENALTY – Applicant sought compliance with mediated settlement agreement – Authority ordered compliance on basis of respondent’s admission agreement breached – Applicant sought penalty for breach – Applicant claimed respondent made repeated breaches, in particular made disparaging comments to applicant in public – Found respondent failed to comply with agreement in good faith – Found breach serious and aggravated by respondent’s further failure to make payment under earlier Authority determination – Found $600 penalty warranted – Compliance ordered – Penalty granted |
| Result | Applications granted ; Compliance ordered ; Penalty ($600)(Shared between Crown and Applicant) ; No costs order |
| Main Category | Penalty |
| Statutes | ERA s136(2);ERA s149 |
| Cases Cited | Hooton v Keeley t/a WOF Testing Station unreported, A Dumbleton, 29 Jan 2009, AA29/09 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 198_10.pdf [pdf 13 KB] |