Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 284/10
Hearing date 23 Mar 2010
Determination date 16 June 2010
Member K J Anderson
Representation P Keightley (in person) ; J Pye
Location Auckland
Parties Keightley (Labour Inspector) v Blisland Dairies Ltd
Summary ARREARS OF WAGES – ARREARS OF HOLIDAY PAY – RECOVERY OF MONIES – Applicant Labour Inspector sought $1,686 arrears of wages and holiday pay on behalf of employee (“X”) – Respondent argued employment agreement (“EA”) provided employer’s right to withhold wages if employee damaged property – Authority found respondent failed to prove X responsible for damage – Found respondent had no evidence of condition of property prior to X commencing employment – Found respondent not entitled to withhold wages pursuant to EA – Found however, respondent entitled to reimbursement of value of furniture wrongfully taken by X – Found $1,686 arrears of wages and holiday pay due and owning less reimbursement for value of furniture taken – PENALTY – Applicant sought penalty against respondent for faiure to comply with Holiday Act 2003 – Authority found while respondent believed exercising lawful rights under EA, respondent failed to keep and maintain wage and time records – Found $200 penalty warranted
Result Applications granted (Arrears of wages)(Arrears of holiday pay)(Recovery of monies-Removal of furniture)(Penalty) ; Application dismissed (Recovery of monies-Damage to property) ; Arrears of wages ($299.96)(Pay for day in lieu) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($1,386.44) ; Recovery of monies (Value of furniture)(Quantum to be determined) ; Penalty ($200)(Payable to Crown) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($70)(Filing fee)
Main Category Arrears
Statutes Holidays Act 2003;ERA s232;ERA s232(4)
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: aa 284_10.pdf [pdf 26 KB]