Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No CA 136/10
Hearing date 27 May 2010
Determination date 29 June 2010
Member H Doyle
Representation S McAuslin ; N Brown
Location Christchurch
Parties Keach v Brown & Son Construction Ltd formerly Otago Building Services Ltd
Summary JURISDICTION - Whether employee or independent contractor - Applicant offered and accepted contract for services with respondent - No written contract - Applicant generally advised or usually knew where expected to work each day - Applicant had some flexibility as could leave building site to undertake other tasks - Applicant initially used some of own tools but subsequently tools and equipment provided by respondent - Applicant also provided with van and cell phone - When applicant concerned about loss of income during respondent’s shut down over Christmas respondent’s director negotiated work for applicant with another building firm - Authority found intention of parties for applicant to be independent contractor - However, found applicant subject to element of control - Found applicant integrated into respondent - Found applicant not registered for GST - Found applicant submitted timesheets not invoices - Found applicant did not employ other people - Found no evidence applicant engaged in any other significant work or was aware could do so - Found was respondent that negotiated work for applicant over Christmas shut down with other building firm - Found applicant not in business on own account - Authority did not hear any evidence as to practice of engaging builders labourers as contractors so no assistance from industry practice - Found real nature of relationship that of employment - Applicant employee - Builders Labourer
Result Application granted ; Costs reserved
Main Category Jurisdiction
Statutes ERA s6
Cases Cited Bryson v Three Foot Six Ltd and Ors [2005] 1 ERNZ 372 ; [2005] 3 NZLR 721
Number of Pages 7
PDF File Link: ca 136_10.pdf [pdf 27 KB]