| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 83A/10 |
| Determination date | 01 July 2010 |
| Member | H Doyle |
| Representation | T Twomey ; J Goldstein |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Golding and Anor v Pye |
| Other Parties | Hammond |
| Summary | COSTS – Unsuccessful application regarding identity of employer – One day investigation meeting – Respondent sought $1,500 contribution to costs from each applicant – Authority found respondent’s late production of statements based on unsworn affidavits contributed to delays – Found respondent to assume responsibility as director of company for failure to provide written employment agreement – Found matter should have been dealt with quicker – Authority took into account applicant’s limited financial resources – No order for costs |
| Result | No order for costs |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA s65;Companies Act 1993 s25 |
| Cases Cited | Colosimo v Parker (2007) 8 NZELC 98;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 |
| Number of Pages | 5 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 83a_10.pdf [pdf 30 KB] |