| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 349/10 |
| Determination date | 05 August 2010 |
| Member | J Wilson |
| Representation | YC Ye (in person) ; S Fong |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Ye v Ruifa Produce Ltd |
| Summary | COMPLIANCE ORDER - Applicant sought compliance with Authority determination - Authority had ordered respondent to pay applicant compensation for hurt and humiliation, eight weeks wages, outstanding annual leave and sick leave entitlement at specified rate for applicant’s last day of work up to specified date - Applicant claimed not paid sick leave owed - Respondent claimed paid all sick leave owed - Authority found applicant paid all sick leave entitled to - Found applicant had interpreted Authority’s order as conferring additional entitlement to sick leave over and above that provided in employment agreement and Holidays Act 2003 - Authority stated was not intention of order - Intention of order was for applicant to be paid her entitlement for paid sick leave for that period – Authority apologised if wording of order had led applicant to assume entitled to more payment for sick leave - Found respondent had complied with all of Authority’s order - Compliance order declined - Application dismissed |
| Result | Application dismissed ; No order for costs |
| Main Category | Compliance Order |
| Cases Cited | Ye v Ruifa Produce Ltd unreported, J Wilson, 21 Apr 2009, AA 129/09 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 349_10.pdf [pdf 16 KB] |