| Restrictions | Includes non-publication order |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 275A/10 |
| Determination date | 08 July 2010 |
| Member | R Arthur |
| Representation | C Eggleston ; J Rooney |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Te Stroet v Fonterra Cooperative Group |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Supplementary determination of Authority - In previous determination Authority ordered applicant’s name not be published for 30 days unless order varied by Authority or Employment Court (“EC”) - Order made to preserve applicant’s privacy over 28 day period in which either party could file challenge to determination in EC - Applicant advised respondent had filed challenge - Applicant’s counsel on leave and counsel supervising file in their absence sought three week extension of non-publication order on urgent basis so counsel had sufficient time after returning from leave to make any necessary application to EC for further extension - Respondent did not oppose application for limited extension on that basis - Non-publication order extended for further 21 days until specified date - As matter now before EC any further applications for orders regarding publication of any part of evidence, pleadings, and names of any party or witness to be made to EC |
| Result | Application granted ; Orders made ; No order for costs |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | ERA s179;ERA Second Schedule cl10 |
| Cases Cited | Te Stroet v Fonterra Cooperative Group unreported, R Arthur, 11 Jun 2010, AA 275/10 |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 275a_10.pdf [pdf 9 KB] |