Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 374/10
Hearing date 11 May 2010
Determination date 20 August 2010
Member A Dumbleton
Representation G Sun (in person) ; W Gillooly
Location Auckland
Parties Sun v Pitango Innovative Cuisine Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustified dismissal – Respondent claimed dismissal justified for serious misconduct – Respondent witnessed applicant driving forklift recklessly and without licence in breach of lawful and reasonable instructions – Respondent immediately held meeting for applicant to explain allegation – Applicant explained drove forklift fast to finish job quickly – Respondent advised conduct unacceptable and dismissed applicant for serious misconduct – Respondent held meeting to advise employees of workplace health and safety - Applicant subsequently asked respondent for re-employment – Respondent advised in good faith would consider re-employment if applicant provided adequate explanation for misconduct, apologise for behaviour and show commitment to health and safety – Applicant subsequently made complaint to Department of Labour Health and Safety Inspector – Respondent disclosed incident to Inspector - No further action taken with regard to complaint – Personal grievance raised – Authority found respondent reasonably believed from direct observation, applicant driving unsupervised and at excessive speed in breach of instructions – Found previous warning not technically disciplinary warning, however, amounted to instruction to obey safety requirements – Found fair procedure followed in particular circumstances, bearing in mind paramount importance of workplace safety – Dismissal justified – COSTS – No order for costs as applicant self represented – Forklift Driver
Result Application dismissed ; No order for costs
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A
Number of Pages 3
PDF File Link: aa 374_10.pdf [pdf 16 KB]