| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 390/10 |
| Determination date | 27 August 2010 |
| Member | R Arthur |
| Representation | K Reedy (in person) ; J Goldsmith, R Teddy |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Reedy v Network Murupara Inc |
| Summary | COMPLIANCE ORDER – Applicant sought compliance with mediated settlement – Applicant also claimed unpaid final pay and holiday pay – No reply from respondent to application and request for urgency – Application for urgency granted – Investigation meeting held by teleconference – Respondent had made only two of eleven weekly instalment payments agreed to – Applicant claimed respondent had account containing funds which could be used to pay sums owing – Respondent disputed whether funds in account sufficient or could be diverted to pay applicant – Compliance ordered – Found respondent had assets which could be sold or be used to secure loan to pay applicant – Authority ordered payment be made within 21 days of determination – Respondent warned of consequences of failure to comply – Authority decided not to make order regarding unpaid final pay and holiday pay as not referred to in settlement agreement – Found if debt remained due, to be ranked among other creditors |
| Result | Compliance ordered ; No order for costs |
| Main Category | Compliance Order |
| Statutes | ERA s137;ERA s137(3);ERA s138(6);ERA s141;ERA s140(6) |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 390_10.pdf [pdf 18 KB] |