Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No CA 176/10
Hearing date 14 Jul 2010
Determination date 02 September 2010
Member J Crichton
Representation A McCormack, A Lloyd ; C Mundy-Smith
Location Christchurch
Parties Hetem-Harris v Beauty Management Riccarton Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Respondent argued applicant abandoned employment – Applicant claimed required to work significantly higher hours than had been promised – Claimed worked total working span of 19 days without a break – Found respondent had no business premises of its own and simply existed to provide and manage labour in beauty salons – Applicant claimed given various directions by J – Respondent denied J had any management authority over applicant – Applicant claimed had no idea about structure of employer and formed reasonable belief was to follow instructions of J – Applicant told by J being given one weeks notice of dismissal – Applicant attended work to hand in uniform and told not to make any decisions until contacted by respondent next morning – No contact made – Applicant refused to return to work when contacted by respondent one week later – Authority informed parties during course of investigation meeting that absolutely satisfied applicant unjustifiably dismissed – However, for avoidance of doubt Authority set out reasoning – Found applicant believed on reasonable grounds had been dismissed – Found respondent had not repaired earlier default – Found delaying call to one week later not action of fair and reasonable employer – Found dismissal by telephone in peremptory manner entirely without process or justification – Dismissal unjustified – Remedies – No contributory conduct – Found applicant entitled to holiday pay and reimbursement of lost wages – Found $5,000 compensation appropriate – Beauty Therapist
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($9,360) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($1,959) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: ca 176_10.pdf [pdf 22 KB]