| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 177/10 |
| Determination date | 03 September 2010 |
| Member | J Crichton |
| Representation | F Wall ; P Shaw |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Valentine v Canterbury District Health Board |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Quantification of remedies – Dispute answered in favour of applicant – Parties left to determine remedies by negotiation – Authority found determination not well expressed – Authority erroneously directed parties to compensation under Employment Relations Act 2000 instead of compensation pursuant to Collective Employment Agreement (“CEA”) – Parties failed to agree on application of provisions of CEA – Applicant claimed compensation and lost wages – Respondent claimed applicant refused to agree to reconfirmation and matter should be at end – Authority found no personal grievance therefore no entitlement to remedies – Found dispute regarding interpretation of CEA – Found applicant entitled to severance pay under CEA – Authority directed applicant to be paid severance pay |
| Result | Questions answered ; Orders accordingly ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 177_10.pdf [pdf 16 KB] |