Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 404/10
Determination date 07 September 2010
Member D King
Representation B Edwards ; T Wallace, A Caisley
Location Auckland
Parties Carter v Vanda Wholesale Blind Co Ltd and Anor
Other Parties Vanda Holdings Ltd
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applicant filed amended statement of problem alleging had been employed by both respondents – Claimed second respondent attempting to hide behind corporate veil to avoid obligations to applicant – First respondent opposed application for joinder of second respondent – Authority found no grounds for piercing corporate veil – Found respondents had different directors and while common shareholders also shareholders that did not hold shares in both companies – Found first respondent not subsidiary of second respondent – Discussed authority that Courts would not interfere with lawfully created entities provided structures genuine and intended to operate in accordance with their tenor; and transactions would be enforced even if were for ulterior commercial purpose – Found parties could choose whatever legal arrangements they wanted provided not shams – Authority discussed broad grounds to lift corporate veil – Found respondents distinct legal entities – Found nothing fraudulent, underhand, or nefarious in creation of respondents – Found fact there were family connections did not alter situation – Found neither company established or used to avoid existing legal duty – Found applicant not also employee of second respondent – Found no grounds to lift corporate veil – Orders made
Result Application dismissed ; Orders made ; Costs reserved
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Cases Cited The Official Assignee as Assignee of the Bankrupt Estate of Alan Cliff Armitage v Sanctuary Propvest Ltd unreported, HC AK CIV-2009-404-0852, 11 June 2009, Asher J;Square 1 Service Group Ltd v Butler [1994] 1 ERNZ 667
Number of Pages 4
PDF File Link: aa 404_10.pdf [pdf 18 KB]