Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 405/10
Hearing date 6 Jul 2010
Determination date 07 September 2010
Member D King
Representation K Tipa ; M Messenger
Location Auckland
Parties Csore and Anor v MJRC Therapies Ltd (formerly Essentially Skin Ltd)
Other Parties Panton
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Applicants employed by respondent who was predecessor of company M – Applicant’s claimed told would be no interviews for positions with respondent – Applicant’s told unsuccessful in gaining employment with respondent – However, other staff of respondent and new staff were employed – Second applicant offered employment at another branch of respondents on casual basis and no offer made to recompense travel expenses – Applicants did not dispute commercial rationale for sale of business – However, issue with manner redundancies carried out – Authority found applicants allowed to attend interviews for new company in work time – Found neither references or certificates of service provided at time of termination – Found respondent’s position would not have been prejudiced by disclosure of imminent sale – Furthermore, no confidentiality provision in later agreement – Found respondent owed duty to advise employees was considering to sell business – Found respondent failed to advise and consult employees regarding potential sale of business and disestablishment of positions – Dismissals unjustified – Remedies – Found $2,000 compensation appropriate – Found no notice period in employment agreement – Found two weeks would have been reasonable notice
Result Application granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($2,000)(each) ; Arrears of wages (Notice period) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s4;ERA s4(1B);ERA s4(1C)
Cases Cited Harris v Charter Trucks Limited unreported, Couch J, 11 Sept 2007, CC 16/07
Number of Pages 4
PDF File Link: aa 405_10.pdf [pdf 18 KB]