| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 299A/10 |
| Determination date | 24 September 2010 |
| Member | J Wilson |
| Representation | M Whitehead ; A Hopkinson |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Lenihan v Conspec Construction Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS – Unsuccessful personal grievance and arrears claims – Half day investigation meeting – No costs submissions received from applicant – Respondent sought $3,000 contribution to total costs of $14,948 – Respondent claimed applicant rejected Calderbank offer – Respondent claimed applicant entirely unsuccessful in claims and fair and reasonable contribution should be made to respondent’s costs – Authority found appropriate applicant contribute towards respondent’s costs – Found had applicant accepted Calderbank offer would have saved both parties time and expense - $3,000 contribution to costs appropriate |
| Result | Costs in favour of respondent ($3,000) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Cases Cited | PBO (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 299a_10.pdf [pdf 11 KB] |