Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 474/10
Hearing date 27 Jul 2010
Determination date 08 November 2010
Member E Robinson
Representation A Hope ; D Gardiner
Location Hamilton
Parties Briskie v McHannigan and Anor
Other Parties Parker
Summary JURISDICTION – Whether applicant employed by respondents – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed – Respondents denied employing applicant – Applicant claimed offered cleaning position at Lodge and resigned from current employment and moved to join husband at Lodge – Applicant claimed paid weekly wage from which rent deducted – Applicant claimed dismissed following complaints about work and accused of stealing – No documentation to support assertion of employment relationship – Respondents claimed not employed to operate or manage Lodge – Mr McGurk (“M”) employed second respondent to collect rent and provide cleaning services – Applicant claimed Lodge leased to respondents by M – Authority found no lease – Found no evidence to support applicant’s claim offered employment as cleaner – Respondent denied applicant employed to clean communal areas – Respondent claimed applicant only required to clean own room – Found insufficient evidence applicant performed cleaning duties other than those expected as tenant – Applicant claimed rent reimbursement as rent increased for additional room – Applicant claimed additional room not provided but applicant provided cleaning services for rent reduction for second room – Found applicant not paid by virtue of additional room at low rental for cleaning services – Found insufficient evidence to support applicant came off Invalid Benefit when received wages from respondents – Found no evidence to support applicant paid for cleaning services – Found no employment relationship
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Number of Pages 10
PDF File Link: aa 474_10.pdf [pdf 32 KB]