Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 369A/10
Determination date 19 November 2010
Member V Campbell
Representation R Smith ; no appearnace for first respondent, K McLuskie for second and third respondents
Location Auckland
Parties Zhao v Health and Body Clinic Ltd & Ors
Other Parties Arnesen ; Arnesen
Summary COSTS - Successful compliance order application - Matter determined on the papers - Applicant successful in personal grievance claim - Applicant subsequently awarded costs - First respondent failed to pay amounts awarded by Authority - Applicant sought compliance order and to join second and third respondents as directors of first respondent - First respondent ordered to comply with Authority determinations - Second and third respondents ordered to cause payments to be made by first respondent - Applicant sought contribution to total costs of $3,150 plus disbursements - Second and third respondents claimed while ordered to take steps to ensure payment pursuant to compliance order made should not be liable for costs applicant incurred in seeking compliance order - Authority found second and third respondents should be liable for costs incurred - Found actual costs incurred by applicant reasonable - Found having regard to nature and length of investigation, and in principled exercise of discretion $1,000 award of costs plus disbursements reasonable - Respondents to pay applicant $1,000 contribution to costs plus $220 disbursements
Result Costs in favour of applicant ($1,000) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($220)
Main Category Costs
Cases Cited PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] 1 ERNZ 808;Zhao v Health and Body Clinic Ltd unreported, V Campbell, 26 Mar 2010, AA 144/10;Zhao v Health and Body Clinic Ltd unreported, V Campbell, 2 Jun 2010, AA 144A/10;Zhao v Health and Body Clinic Ltd & Ors unreported, V Campbell, 19 Aug 2010, AA 369/10
Number of Pages 3
PDF File Link: aa 369a_10.pdf [pdf 11 KB]