| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 491/10 |
| Determination date | 22 November 2010 |
| Member | D King |
| Representation | A Hope ; S McKechnie |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Creedy v Commissioner of Police |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Supreme Court found applicant unable to pursue unjustified dismissal grievance – Applicant claimed unjustified disadvantage – Respondent asked preliminary matters be determined – Authority agreed with respondent applicant attempted to bring evidence of constructive dismissal – Found applicant claimed did not seek remedies for dismissal but evident applicant wished to do so – Applicant claimed evidence of dismissal showed chain of causation between losses suffered and unjustifiable actions – Applicant sought to bring evidence post grievance – Found evidence could not be brought regarding alleged dismissal – Found applicant unable to bring reinstatement claim as no longer employee – Found no claim for lost wages as applicant suspended on full pay – Applicant to quantify compensation sought – Applicant to file amended Statement of Problem in order to raise claim for wages as result of loss of chance of promotion |
| Result | Orders made ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Cases Cited | Coy v Commissioner of Police unreported, Colgan CJ, 19 Nov 2007, CC 23/07 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 491_10.pdf [pdf 25 KB] |