| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 215/10 |
| Hearing date | 23 Nov 2010 |
| Determination date | 24 November 2010 |
| Member | J Crichton |
| Representation | D Chamberlain (in person) ; J Scanlon (in person) |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Chamberlain v Scanlon |
| Summary | DISPUTE – Applicant claimed not given appropriate notice of termination of employment agreement (“EA”) – Respondent denied second EA ever formed and maintained fulfilled obligations of giving proper notice under earlier EA – EA gave each party right to end employment relationship on 4 weeks notice – Respondent gave sufficient notice to bring employment relationship to end but offered opportunity of continuing employment on reduced hours – Applicant claimed accepted new position – Authority found no second EA – Found applicant expressed interest in continuing employment but no agreement reached – Found respondent complied with obligations to be fair and reasonable employer – Found applicant mistaken second EA entered – COSTS – Length of investigation meeting not specified – Costs to lie where they fall – Personal Assistant |
| Result | Question answered in favour of respondent ; Costs to lie where they fall |
| Main Category | Dispute |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 215_10.pdf [pdf 15 KB] |