| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 227/10 |
| Determination date | 09 December 2010 |
| Member | J Crichton |
| Representation | K Baldwin (in person) ; P Ashworth |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Baldwin (Labour Inspector) v Bulk Substances Ltd |
| Summary | COMPLIANCE ORDER – Applicant Labour Inspector sought compliance with Authority determination – Authority found applicant took all proper steps to obtain payment from respondent – Respondent suggested determination would be challenged – Found no action taken – Found continuing argument about issues already determined not an alternative to making payment of debt due and owing as consequence of Authority’s order – Found compliance order appropriate – Found no other appropriate remedies – Compliance ordered |
| Result | Compliance ordered ; No order for costs |
| Main Category | Compliance Order |
| Statutes | ERA s137(1)(b) |
| Cases Cited | NZ Distribution Union v Mildon [1989] 3 NZILR 20;Wellington Hotels etc IUW v Byfield Stud Ltd [1988] NZILR 487 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |