| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 312A/10 |
| Determination date | 16 December 2010 |
| Member | J Wilson |
| Representation | L Yukich ; G Service |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Robinson v Transfield Services (NZ) Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS – Joint application to substantive matter – Respondent sought $15000 contribution to costs – Applicant claimed costs to lie where the fall – Respondent argued applicant chose to litigate historical issue and sought outcome of little practical effect – Applicant claimed substantive determination favoured applicant but no winners or losers as result of joint application and costs to lie where they fall – Applicant also argued respondent acquiesced on matter of costs – Authority accepted applicant’s argument that no winners and losers in joint application – Found fairest outcome that costs to lie where they fall |
| Result | Costs to lie where they fall |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Number of Pages | 5 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 312a_10.pdf [pdf 25 KB] |