Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2011] NZERA Auckland 12
Hearing date 10 Dec 2011
Determination date 13 January 2011
Member D King
Representation A McInally ; N Taefi
Location Auckland
Parties Bourne v Boc Ltd
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for name suppression – Applicant sought name suppression to prevent identity being published in event of media coverage of Authority’s proceedings or determination – Applicant claimed high probability of media interest in case – Respondent argued applicant’s non-employment related offending necessitated termination of employment – Applicant claimed suppression order of material value to protect identity from public disclosure – Claimed disadvantage likely to suffer as consequence of disclosure outweighed benefit to public – Claimed had already been punished by Crown and respondent for criminal offending – Claimed disclosure would create insurmountable barrier to finding employment and moving on with life – Respondent argued offending already in public domain because applicant disclosed details of offending to colleagues – Found in exercising discretion had to balance justice of particular party’s position and public interest in open justice – Found no exceptional circumstances that administration of justice frustrated – Found risk of media coverage of proceedings did not amount to exceptional circumstances – Found applicant required to demonstrate compelling reasons consistent with interests of justice for making order – Suppression order declined
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Statutes ERA Schedule 2, Cl 10
Cases Cited Anderson v The Employment Tribunal [1992] 1 ERNZ 500;Davis v Bank of New Zealand [2004] 2 ERNZ 511;White v Auckland District Health Board [2007] ERNZ 441; [2007] ERNZ 441;X v ADHB [2007] 1 ERNZ 66;Y v D [2004] 1 ERNZ 1
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Auckland_12.pdf [pdf 19 KB]