| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2011] NZERA Auckland 74 |
| Determination date | 25 February 2011 |
| Member | A Dumbleton |
| Representation | P King ; K Sutton |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | King v Physio Rehab Group Ltd and Ors |
| Other Parties | Tepid Baths Physiotherapy Ltd, College Rifles Physio & Rehab Centre Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Identity of employer – Investigation reopened to determine identity of employer – Orders made against first (“PRGL”) and third respondent companies (“C”) – Second respondent (“TBPL”) found not employer of applicant as not registered during applicant’s employment – Another company registered as TBPL during applicant’s employment but name changed to Albert Street Physio Limited (“ASPL”) – Authority found TBPL was different company – Applicant received letter of termination signed by director of TBPL and PRGL (“S”) – Found TBPL did not exist at time – S claimed Tepid Baths Physiotherapy Limited (“T”) abbreviated to TBPL in letter – Found respondent should have been referred to as ASPL formerly T, or T – No orders made against TBPL – Orders made against PRGL and C satisfied |
| Result | Application granted ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | ERA Second Schedule cl4 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | 2011_NZERA_Auckland_74.pdf [pdf 15 KB] |