Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No [2011] NZERA Wellington 28
Determination date 23 February 2011
Member G J Wood
Representation P O'Sullivan ; S Davies, T Cleary
Location Wellington
Parties Gini v Literacy Training Ltd & Anor
Other Parties Clareburt-Sturgess
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Second respondent sought to have claims against her dismissed - Second respondent managing director of first respondent - Second respondent claimed no employment relationship between her and applicant - First respondent did not oppose application - Applicant opposed application on three grounds - Firstly, claimed second respondent properly a party as penalty sought for inciting, instigating, aiding or abetting breach of employment agreement - Secondly, claimed second respondent “inextricably and integrally involved as employer regardless of any notion of labelling and limitation of liability” - Thirdly, claimed was compelling argument for lifting corporate veil - Authority found applicant’s claims for inciting, instigating, aiding or abetting breaches of employment agreement by first respondent could only be determined in substantive investigation meeting - Second respondent’s application dismissed - Authority noted applicant faced substantial hurdles to overcome if was to be successful in claim that second respondent was employer - Found applicant offered and accepted employment first respondent - Found principles of limited liability companies and liability of directors well established - Authority noted common law had long held corporate veil not to be lifted lightly - Applicant informed given formidable obstacles facing if unsuccessful Authority would consider claim for indemnity costs by second respondent
Result Application dismissed ; No order for costs
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Statutes ERA s134(2)
Cases Cited Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22
Number of Pages 3
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Wellington_28.pdf [pdf 11 KB]