Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2011] NZERA Auckland 80
Hearing date 1 Mar 2011
Determination date 03 March 2011
Member R Larmer
Representation D Grindle ; R Lambert
Location Whangarei
Parties Graham v Northland Waste Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Respondent claimed applicant fixed term employee and employment ended because fixed term expired – Respondent claimed only wished to engage applicant until review of business needs – Respondent did not provide copy of employment agreement, nor advise applicant to seek independent advice – Authority found fixed term agreement presented to applicant after applicant started work – Applicant claimed did not agree to become fixed term employee – Found respondent could not unilaterally impose fixed term agreement on applicant – Found respondent should have provided fixed term agreement before applicant started work – Found applicant not fixed term employee – Found had respondent not relied on fixed term agreement to end applicant’s employment, almost certain applicant would have been made redundant – Found no fair process undertaken before terminating applicant’s employment – Dismissal unjustified – REMEDIES – Found no reimbursement of lost wages because of likelihood of redundancy – Applicant claimed distressed as had to remove daughter from preschool because could no longer afford it and forced to move into parent’s garage – $6,000 compensation appropriate – COSTS – Half day investigation meeting – $1,700 contribution to costs appropriate – Fleet Manager/Maintenance Officer
Result Application granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($6,000) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($1,700) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee)
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s63;ERA s63A;ERA s66
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Auckland_80.pdf [pdf 22 KB]