| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2011] NZERA Auckland 91 |
| Hearing date | 8 Mar 2011 |
| Determination date | 10 March 2011 |
| Member | A Dumbleton |
| Representation | DK Sidana (in person) ; A Bhatia |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Sidana v Anil Securities Ltd |
| Summary | COMPLIANCE ORDER – Applicant sought compliance with Authority determination – Applicant claimed $2,907 arrears of wages due but not paid – No appearance for respondent at previous investigation meeting – Respondent claimed unaware of application made by applicant or investigation meeting subsequently held – Authority found support staff put considerable time and effort into serving respondent with application and with notice of investigation meeting – Respondent claimed changed address – Found search of Companies Office files showed same address for respondent as documents served at – Authority claimed entitled to rely on information contained in public records of Companies Office – Found respondent’s responsibility to ensure addresses for registered office remained up to date – Found to not grant compliance would severely disadvantage applicant – Found respondent should not obtain unfair advantage through neglect of director and owner – Found respondent did not comply with terms of Authority determination – Compliance ordered |
| Result | Compliance ordered ; No order for costs ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(Filing fee) |
| Main Category | Compliance Order |
| Statutes | ERA s137;ERA s140 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2011_NZERA_Auckland_91.pdf [pdf 18 KB] |