| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | WA 64/02 |
| Hearing date | 16 Jul 2002 |
| Determination date | 20 July 2002 |
| Member | G J Wood |
| Representation | J Douglas ; J Kean |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | Thomas v Fujitsu New Zealand Ltd |
| Summary | COMPLIANCE ORDER - Compliance with terms of mediated settlement sought - Agreement to provide training - Alleged training inadequate - Training through self-study course - Policy change required all staff undergoing training to be bonded - Self-study sufficient training in terms of settlement - Bonding policy introduced after settlement - Bonding not part of settlement - Compliance order directing applicant not to be bonded - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Alleged breach of contract - Insufficient training - Bonding was unilateral variation of contract - Training sufficient - Bonding was only prospective - No present damage - Disadvantage claim not established |
| Result | Application granted (Compliance order) ; Compliance ordered ; Application dismissed (Unjustified disadvantage) ; Costs reserved |
| Statutes | ERA s137(1)(iii) |
| Number of Pages | 8 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |