Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2011] NZERA Auckland 137
Hearing date 4 Nov 2010
Determination date 07 April 2011
Member K J Anderson
Representation L Singh (in person) ; G Saraswat
Location Hamilton
Parties Singh v Golden Indian Enterprises Ltd
Summary JURISDICTION – Whether respondent applicant’s employer – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Respondent claimed no employment relationship with applicant – Applicant produced evidence of payments made by respondent into applicant’s bank account – Applicant claimed pay reduced and following angry exchange with respondent did not return to restaurant – Applicant claimed dismissed – Authority found content of written statement at variance with oral evidence in which applicant claimed dismissed by respondent after disagreement at flat – Respondent accepted had known applicant for some time – Respondent claimed applicant never worked at restaurant – Found nothing to record applicant employee – Found applicant may have done some work at restaurant and respondent considered employing applicant but decided against it – Respondent claimed applicant rented flat from respondent but rent had not been paid – Respondent claimed confronted applicant about payment of rent and argument arose, and applicant left flat – Respondent claimed borrowed money from applicant and repaid it over four payments – Authority preferred respondent’s evidence regarding payments – Found evidence pertaining to matter confusing and uncertain – Found respondent’s evidence more credible and consistent than applicant’s – Found applicant unable to prove employment relationship existed – Found Authority had no jurisdiction to investigate claims – Chef
Result Application dismissed ; No order for costs
Main Category Jurisdiction
Cases Cited Sharma v Golden Indian Enterprises Limited unreported, Y Oldfield, 7 April 2009, AA 110/09
Number of Pages 4
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Auckland_137.pdf [pdf 16 KB]