Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2011] NZERA Auckland 183
Hearing date 2 Mar 2011
Determination date 06 May 2011
Member V Campbell
Representation A Singh ; W Davies
Location Auckland
Parties Anderson v Promax Computers Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Constructive Dismissal – Applicant claimed constructively dismissed by respondent – Director of respondent company (“D”) approached applicant and enquired whether applicant took money out of till – Applicant declined taking money out of till – Applicant attended disciplinary meeting and given opportunity to resign or be dismissed – Applicant resigned and claimed resignation was constructive dismissal – D claimed money missing from till – Video footage showed applicant doing something in till area and put something in pocket – Applicant claimed did not remember – D invited applicant to disciplinary meeting and gave applicant opportunity to go home until meeting – Applicant chose to remain at work – Authority preferred D’s evidence – Applicant claimed returned to office to retrieve iphone which was charging at D’s desk – D claimed applicant could recharge iphone at own workstation – Authority found applicant’s responses about what applicant was doing in office seemed unlikely to be entirely accurate – Respondent claimed mentioned resignation but as option not threat – Found D did not actually tell applicant would be dismissed – Found conversation about resignation not intended to be coercive – Found D did not act in way designed to extract resignation – No constructive dismissal – Computer Programmer
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A
Cases Cited Auckland etc Shop Employees etc IUOW v Woolworths (NZ) Ltd [1985] 2 NZLR 372;Wellington etc Clerical etc IUOW v Greenwich [1983] ACJ 965
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Auckland_183.pdf [pdf 18 KB]