Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2011] NZERA Auckland 194
Determination date 11 May 2011
Member R Larmer
Representation D Flaws ; R Harrison
Location Auckland
Parties Barzegari v Little Turkish Cafe Ltd
Summary COSTS – Successful wages arrears claim – Three day investigation meeting – Authority heard from 11 witnesses and two translators required – Extensive documentation provided, including documents not in English – Respondent put applicant to proof in every aspect of claim – Authority found despite knowing respondent had not fully complied with obligations in relation to wages and holiday pay, respondent did not take steps to remedy errors – Found respondent only made concessions at investigation meeting so applicant still had to provide evidence to prove and quantify claims – Found respondent entitled to put applicant to proof in every element of claim but unnecessarily increased costs – Found respondent failed to follow Authority’s instructions on calculating applicant’s relevant daily pay – Found respondent’s actions increased applicant’s costs – Applicant sought $9,200 actual costs plus $1,419 disbursements – Respondent claimed applicant effectively self-represented and no costs should be awarded – Found applicant assisted by advocate with preparation of evidence and documentation and advocate took active role as representative during investigation meeting and subsequent communications with Authority – Authority accepted costs claimed by applicant actually incurred – Found $9,200 costs appropriate – Found limited evidence provided of disbursements
Result Costs in favour of applicant ($9,200) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($376.66)
Main Category Costs
Statutes Holidays Act 2003 s9(3)
Cases Cited IR Thompson Associates Limited v Petro-Tech Services Limited unreported, P Cheyne, 20 June 2002, CA 61/02;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Auckland_194.pdf [pdf 17 KB]