Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2011] NZERA Christchurch 45
Determination date 29 March 2011
Member J Crichton
Representation P Cranney ; N McPhail
Location Christchurch
Parties Chivers and Ors v Foodstuffs South Island Ltd
Summary PENALTY – Authority previously determined union’s resolution to take strike action in future was not itself strike within meaning of law – Authority found respondent acted illegally in suspending workers in reliance on strike resolution – Applicants sought penalties – Respondent claimed pay withheld did not constitute deduction in terms of Wages Protection Act 1983 (“WPA”) – Authority found workers paid hourly rate and nothing precluded operation of provisions of WPA – Respondent claimed penalties should only apply if breach flagrant – Respondent claimed behaviour inadvertent not flagrant – Union claimed respondent’s actions deliberate conscious deduction of money belonging to workers – Union claimed gave respondent notice action wrong – Found respondent simply got it wrong and as consequence workers deprived of wages – Found not satisfied behaviour flagrant but available to Authority to consider imposition of penalty – Found significant global fund should not be awarded to discourage bad behaviour – Found respondent responded inappropriately to resolution concerning strike action – Found respondent large successful company and workers low paid – $1,000 penalty payable to each affected worker appropriate
Result Application granted ; Penalty ($1,000)(Payable to each applicant) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Penalty
Statutes ERA s87(4);ERA s161(1)(m);Wages Protection Act 1983 s4;Wages Protection Act 1983 s13
Cases Cited McCullough v Otago Sheetmetal and Engineering Ltd unreported, J Crichton, 14 Oct 2008, CA 153/08;Spotless Services New Zealand Ltd v Service & Food Workers’ Union [2008] ERNZ 609
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Christchurch_45.pdf [pdf 21 KB]