Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2011] NZERA Auckland 252
Determination date 10 June 2011
Member R Arthur
Representation J Wareham (in person) ; S Tee
Location Auckland
Parties Wareham v Rooke t/a Casey Panelbeaters and Anor
Other Parties Sigma Holdings Ltd t/a Casey Panelbeaters
Summary COSTS – Successful personal grievance – Half day investigation meeting – Applicant claimed entitled to reasonable contribution to costs – Respondent noted Authority previously determined redundancy decision genuine and remedies limited to manner of dismissal – Authority noted applicant did not accept respondent’s Calderbank offer and greater than remedy awarded – Respondent claimed applicant’s failure to accept offer meant entitled to costs – Applicant claimed unable to provide costs evidence as representative unwell – Authority found more likely than not applicant aware of respondent’s offer when made – Found as remedy previously awarded by Authority less than respondent’s offer applicant disentitled to award of costs – Respondent sought $3,623 contribution towards costs – Authority noted applicant did not comply with timetable directions increasing respondent’s costs - Found $500 increase from usual tariff appropriate – Authority noted unfortunate net effect was applicant to receive $500 from respondent although incurred $2,629 expenses – Found consequence appropriate due to applicant’s rejection of respondent’s offer - Applicant to pay respondent $2,000 contribution towards costs
Result Costs in favour of respondent ($2,000)
Main Category Costs
Statutes ERA Second Schedule cl15
Cases Cited Aoraki Corporation Ltd v McGavin [1998] ERNZ 601;Bluestar Print Group (NZ) Ltd v Mitchell (2010) 7 NZELR 494;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808;Wareham v Rooke T/A Casey PanelBeaters & Anor [2011] NZERA Auckland 191
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Auckland_252.pdf [pdf 22 KB]