Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2011] NZERA Auckland 339
Hearing date 6 Sep 2010 - 18 Apr 2011 (3 days)
Determination date 28 July 2011
Member A Dumbleton
Representation L Sharma (in person) ; S Shaikh
Location Auckland
Parties Sharma v Monopoliz Supplies Ltd
Summary ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY – Applicant claimed owed wages and holiday pay by respondent – Applicant claimed only received two cash payments and rent paid by business owner (“S”) – S denied applicant employed by respondent as was employed by previous owner (“C”) – Authority found C sold business to respondent – C employed applicant until sale of business when applicant’s employment transferred to respondent – S claimed thought applicant undertaking stock take for C – Found stock take complete on sale of business so no reason for C to continue to employ applicant after business sold – S denied signed written employment agreement with applicant and denied ever employed applicant – Authority accepted applicant’s evidence that ceased employment with C and employed by respondent – Another employee (“H”) confirmed applicant employed at time H employed – Found recording of conversation between parties contained some element of admission by S that money owed to applicant for wages – Found applicant employed by respondent – Found respondent failed to keep wages and time record and failure prejudiced applicant’s ability to bring accurate claim for recovery of wages – Found respondent did not prove amount claimed incorrect – Found outstanding wages and holiday pay due and owing – Interest payable – Shop Assistant
Result Application granted ; Arrears of wages and holiday pay ($6,913) ; No order for costs
Main Category Arrears
Statutes ERA s132
Cases Cited Hanjra v Monopoliz Supplies Limited unreported, R Arthur, 22 Feb 2010, AA 81/10
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Auckland_339.pdf [pdf 19 KB]